USPTO serial 87870580
BELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montréal, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 NORTH CAPITOL STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for household and kitchen use and parts and accessories therefor, including, electric food blenders, electric stand mixers, electric handheld mixers, electric egg or dough beaters, egg slicing machines, electric food slicers, electric food processors, electric food grinders, electric hand-held grinders, electric food choppers, electric food peelers, food and beverage mixers; electric spice grinders, electric meat slicers, electric beaters, electrically powered kitchen appliances for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food, electric fruit squeezers, electric hand-held mixers for household purposes, electric fruit squeezers for household purposes, grating machines for vegetables, machines for making pasta, meat slicing machines, sausage making machines, mills for household purposes other than hand-operated, electric pepper mills; electric milkshake makers, electric blenders, electric juice extractors, electric juicers, beverage making electrical appliances, electric margarita makers, aerated beverage-making machines, electric coffee grinders, brewing machines, milk separators, dairy machines, electric hand-held milk frothers, machines for making soda pop; electric knives, electric knife sharpeners, knife sharpening machines, electric can openers, vacuum sealers, blades for electric food processors, electric crushers for household purposes, electric ice crushers, electric wine openers, electrical apparatus for sealing plastic packaging, electric food sealers, beverage dispensing and storage machines, dishwashers; coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; dairy machines; disintegrators; mixers; food preparation machines, electromechanical; kitchen machines, electric; noodle cutting machines; biscuit marking machine; tea manufacturing machine; crushers for kitchen use, electric; butter machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |