USPTO serial 87870591
BELLA BASICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BELLA BASICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
Montréal, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie Webb Olson
Carrie Webb Olson Day Pitney LLPOne International Place, 17th FloorBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for household and kitchen use and parts and accessories therefor, namely, electric food blenders, electric egg or dough beaters, egg slicing machines, electric food slicers, electric food processors, electric food grinders, electric hand-held grinders, electric food choppers, electric food peelers, electric spice grinders, electric meat slicers, electric food beaters, electrically powered kitchen appliances for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food, electric fruit squeezers, electric fruit squeezers for household purposes, grating machines for vegetables, machines for making pasta, meat slicing machines, sausage making machines, mills for household purposes other than hand-operated, namely, power-operated flour mills for household purposes, electric pepper mills; electric milkshake makers, namely, electric blenders for making milkshakes, electric food blenders, electric juice extractors, electric juicers, non-aerated beverage making electrical appliances, electric margarita makers, aerated beverage-making machines, electric coffee grinders, brewing machines, milk separators, dairy machines, namely, electric milk dispensers and electric cream dispensers, electric hand-held milk frothers, machines for making soda pop; electric knives, electric knife sharpeners, knife sharpening machines, electric can openers, electric vacuum bag sealers, blades for electric food processors, electric crushers for household purposes, electric ice crushers, electric wine openers, electrical apparatus for sealing plastic packaging, electric food bag sealers, beverage dispensing and storage machines, dishwashers; coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; dairy machines, namely, machines for udder cleaning and washing of dairy cows; disintegrators, namely, food waste disposals; food preparation machines, electromechanical, namely, food peeling machines; noodle cutting machines; biscuit marking machine; tea manufacturing machine, namely, tea processing machines; crushers for kitchen use, electric; butter machines" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |