Drawing for ARMORCOAT

USPTO serial 87870739

ARMORCOAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARMORCOAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory S. Vickers

GREGORY S. VICKERS RANKIN, HILL & CLARK LLP23755 LORAIN ROAD, SUITE 200NORTH OLMSTED, OH 44070-2224UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Floor coatings; protective coatings for concrete; Coatings for concrete floors; Coatings for industrial concrete floors; Epoxy and Urethane coatings for concreteACTIVE—
037Concrete coating services; Application of coatings to concrete floorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance