USPTO serial 87871240
KOLMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOLMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) disposable and reusable protective gloves for industrial use, heat protective gloves for industrial use, weather resistant gloves for industrial use and fire resistant gloves; protective masks, turbans and veils for industrial use; industrial protective garments, fire protective clothing, radiation protective clothing, namely, coveralls, overalls, sweatshirts, parkas, jackets, vests, shirts, pants, hoods, hat liners, toques; protective garments incorporating inserts in the form of padding, back protectors and padded protectors for shoulders, arms, elbows, hips, legs and knees, all for protection against fires; protective headgear, caps and hats, namely, visors, goggles, spectacles, glasses, helmets, welders' hats, hard hats, safety helmets, earplugs for divers, ear muffs for hearing protection and noise reduction; testing sample collection equipment, namely, wipes for use in diagnostic testing, not for medical purposes, for use in the food industry, industrial applications and clean rooms and laboratories | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) non-woven disposable textile wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds for use in the food industry, industrial applications, medical applications, dental applications, clean rooms and laboratories | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) hair nets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hopen North America Inc./Hopen Amérique du Nord Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named KOLMI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |