USPTO serial 87871314
DOPE AS FVCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PATE, TARA J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOPE AS FVCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH EL MONTE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Fritz
Jack Fritz FRITZ LAW GROUP87 N RAYMOND AVE STE 927PASADENA, CA 91103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of vegetable glycerin; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of propylene glycol; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Electronic cigarettes; Electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty; Liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; Electronic cigarette cases; Electronic cigarette lighters; Electronic cigarette holders; Oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; Battery-powered, rechargeable portable vaporizing units in the nature of electronic cigarettes and smokeless cigarette vaporizing pipes; Disposable electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) refill cartridges sold filled with vegetable glycerin, propylene glycol, and vaporizable nicotine, for use with battery-powered, rechargeable portable vaporizing units in the nature of electronic cigarettes and smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipes; Cartomizers, namely, combination electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty and atomizers, sold as a component of electronic cigarettes; Cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; Cartridges sold filled with propylene glycol for electronic cigarettes; Cartridges sold filled with vegetable glycerin for electronic cigarettes; Cases for electronic cigarettes and electronic cigarette accessories; Electric cigarettes; Electronic cigarette boxes; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |