USPTO serial 87872802
ZAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D Wells
Nicholas D Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Jellies, jams, compotes, preserves; fruit desserts; fruit salads; preserved, processed, dried and cooked fruits; preparations made from fruits; coconut milk; coconut milk; coconut water; preparations made from prepared, dried, desiccated or processed coconut; almond milk; soya; preparations made from nuts; snack foods; salads; soups; fermented foods; fermented fruits and vegetables; fermented vegetables (kimchi); fermented vegetable foods; fermented soybeans (natto); fermented soybeans; fermented bean curd; salted and fermented seafood (jeotgal); fermented tofu; fermented milk; cooked dishes consisting of fermented vegetables, fermented fruits, fermented sauces and fermented pastes; none of the aforesaid goods being sold in frozen form | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Desserts; puddings; puddings for use as desserts; prepared desserts; prepared desserts; prepared desserts; foodstuffs made of sugar for sweetening desserts; sugar; foodstuffs made of a sweetener for sweetening desserts; foodstuffs made of honey and treacle; custards; muesli desserts; snack foods and snack bars made from cereal, oats, muesli, granola, coconut, chocolate, cake, confectionary and corn; chocolate based bars; popcorn; flour and preparations made from flour; pastry; cakes; buns; biscuits; pastries; cookies; muffins; croissants; gingerbread; tapioca; sago; chocolate; chocolate brownies; confectionery; rice cakes; chocolate coated rice cakes; cocoa and chocolate beverages; dressings for food; food dressings; salad dressings; dressings for salad; salad dressings containing cream; sauces (condiments); condiments; wasabi; miso; kombucha; fermented sauces and pastes; kimchijeon; fermented hot pepper paste (gochujang); none of the aforesaid goods being sold in frozen form | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages; juices; fruit juices; fruit beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; beverages consisting principally of fruit juices; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit and vegetable juices; juice shots containing fruit and vegetable juices; water blended with fruit and vegetable juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages; fermented drinks; Douzhi (fermented bean drink); fermented Kombucha drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |