Drawing for KAIZO CLINICAL RESEARCH

USPTO serial 87873462

KAIZO CLINICAL RESEARCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAIZO CLINICAL RESEARCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael S. Gottlieb

Michael S. Gottlieb MOMENTUM LAW GROUP9211 CORPORATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 350ROCKVILLE, MD 20850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Clinical research in the field of pain, treatment and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, fitness and other health and wellness interventions; Medical and scientific research, namely, conducting clinical trials for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2020PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 4, 2020PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 13, 2020ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2020PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 20, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 31, 2019PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2019TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance