Drawing for CANONICA CACAO BAR

USPTO serial 87875871

CANONICA CACAO BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANONICA CACAO BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S. Ehrlich

Burton S. Ehrlich Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1600Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring chocolates, truffles, caramel, pralines, treats and chocolate-based snack food; commercial consultancy; commercial consultancy in the field of the retail sale of chocolates, caramel, truffles and pralines; consulting in sales techniques and sales programs; sales promotion services, import agency services in the field of specialty chocolate, pastry and dessert ingredients; assistance in franchised commercial business management; business management advisory services relating to franchisingACTIVE—
043Beer garden services; fast-food restaurant services; food and drink catering; preparation of food and beverages; providing of food and drink; rental of bar equipment; rental of chairs, tables, table linen, glassware; rental of portable modular buildings; restaurant and hotel services; snack bar and canteen services; providing information and advice on hotels and restaurants to tourists and business travelersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 30, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 26, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 14, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 14, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance