Drawing for CUSTOM VARIETY PACK

USPTO serial 87877456

CUSTOM VARIETY PACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEHMER, JASON ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CUSTOM VARIETY PACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Stern

STEVEN STERN STERN & SCHURIN LLP595 STEWART AVENUE, SUITE 510GARDEN CITY, NY 11530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, hot chocolate, cappuccino and latte beverages provided in single-serving and portion-controlled containers, pods or capsulesACTIVEDec 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 19, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 1, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2019AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2019IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 23, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2018AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 20, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 19, 2018EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance