USPTO serial 87878312
AI REGULATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AI REGULATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorri W Cooper
Lorri W Cooper Law Artisans LLC387 Wakefield Run Blvd.Hinckley, OH 44233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases, artificial intelligence for analysis of databases, financial analysis, detection and prevention of fraud and security breaches, auditing, risk management, assisting internal and external investigations, calculating risk scores by transaction, entity and individual, governance, and risk and compliance (GRC); computer-implemented data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases; provision of artificial intelligence for analysis of databases; computer-implemented financial analysis; detection and prevention of fraud and security breaches using computer-implemented data analysis; computer-implemented auditing; computer implemented financial valuation; risk management; financial services in the field of auditing, financial valuation, financial forecasting, using computer-implemented data analysis; risk management in the field of providing employee risk scores and governance, risk and compliance (GRC); computer software design and updating; computer software consulting; case management relating to auditing; provision of computer software for auditing, financial regulatory compliance, risk management, detection of data anomalies, fraud and security breaches; software that provides secure access and storage of datasets for detecting anomalies and conducting plausibility checks of datasets, artificial intelligence for analysis of databases and market data, financial analysis, anomaly detection, and prevention of errors, fraud, risk management, assisting internal and external investigations, calculating risk scores, governance, and risk and compliance (GRC) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computer-implemented business data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases; computer-implemented business auditing; business risk management; financial auditing using computer-implemented data analysis; risk management in the field of providing employee risk scores and governance, risk and compliance (GRC); case management relating to business auditing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | computer-implemented financial data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases; provision of artificial intelligence for analysis of databases; computer-implemented financial analysis; computer implemented financial valuation; financial risk management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | detection and prevention of fraud and security breaches using computer-implemented data analysis; provision of artificial intelligence in the nature of online non-downloadable software for analysis of databases in the field of finance; computer software design and updating; computer software consulting; case management relating to energy auditing; providing online non-downloadable computer software for auditing, risk management, detection of data anomalies, fraud and security breaches; Non-downloadable computer software for data analysis for detecting anomalies in databases, artificial intelligence for analysis of databases, financial analysis, detection and prevention of fraud and security breaches, auditing, risk management, assisting internal and external investigations, calculating risk scores by transaction, entity and individual, governance, and risk and compliance (GRC); Non-downloadable software that provides secure access and storage of datasets for detecting anomalies and conducting plausibility checks of datasets, artificial intelligence for analysis of databases and market data, financial analysis, anomaly detection, and prevention of errors, fraud, risk management, assisting internal and external investigations, calculating risk scores, governance, and risk and compliance (GRC); provision of non-downloadable computer software for auditing, financial regulatory compliance, risk management, detection of data anomalies, fraud and security breaches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |