USPTO serial 87879228
SHALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Niederkruechten, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan G. Morton
246 WEST BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; Business administration; Office work, namely, providing office functions | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education, teaching and training, namely, providing classes, seminars and workshops in the field of art, music and artistic performances, fashion, culture, general human interest, film production, languages, science and technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; child care services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal consultation services; Attorney services; legal research; providing legal information; legal document preparation services; legal research services; trademark agent services; licensing of intellectual property; monitoring of intellectual property; intellectual property consultancy; escort services; security guard services; private investigation and security services, namely, personal security consultation, security threat analysis for protecting public safety, security threat analysis for protecting personal property, security guarding for facilities, armed escorts and security personnel for the protection of property and individuals; baggage inspection for security purposes; rental of fire alarms; on-line social networking services; dating services; personal fashion consulting and wardrobe styling services; clothing rental; personal letter writing; personal reminder services in the area of upcoming important dates and events; copyright management; adoption agency services; arbitration; baby sitting; horoscope casting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |