USPTO serial 87881391
NIGEL HOSPITALITY SUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIGEL HOSPITALITY SUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sam Foreman
SAM FOREMAN FLEESON, GOOING, COULSON & KITCH, L.L.C.301 N. MAIN, SUITE 1900WICHITA, KS 67202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | A cloud based customer management system for the restaurant industry that provides for biometric authentication, card swipe authentication, ordering via Alexa, advance reservations, online and mobile ordering, placing orders through hand held devices and table-top mounted devices, calling a restaurant manager from a device, and including an integrated loyalty program and guest pivot and information tracking. A cloud based payment processing system for the restaurant industry that provides for customers to split checks, split payment of items, with integrated payment processing and gift card processing, the ability to void items and checks, and apply discounts to items and checks, and the ability to apply timed or automatic discounts and re-open closed orders. A cloud based management system for the restaurant industry, including table layout and management, programming multiple menus per location and profit center, designating multiple locations and regions, managing menus by brand, region and location with the ability to customize each, real time data syncing from engaged devices, integrated kitchen display system, kitchen server notifications, workflow management for restaurant industry segments, integration with business intelligence software and data providers, importation of data from existing point of service products, real time reporting, suggestive intelligence for selling products, intra-organization gamification, real-time demand forecasting, payroll processing, accounting, inventory management and inventory ordering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |