USPTO serial 87883128
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON STREETSUITE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Balls for games; Body-building apparatus; Body-training apparatus; Electric action toys; Exercise machines; Sport balls; Exercise equipment, namely, chest expanders; Gaming equipment, namely, playing cards, chips, gaming tables and gaming cloths | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |