USPTO serial 87883731
IOV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IOV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Robinson
James R. Robinson ROBINSON LAW OFFICE, PLLC13 Loyola DriveHOT SPRINGS VILLAGE, AR 71909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; computer software for electronic storage of data; computer software in the field of blockchain for encryption; computer software in the field of smart contracts for encryption; computer software for use in relation to artificial intelligence and/or machine learning intelligence and/or machine learning for encryption; computer hardware; computer hardware for computer networks; computer hardware for data processing; computer hardware for data protection; computer hardware for encryption; computer hardware for data communication; computer hardware for data transmission; software for electronic storage of data; downloadable software for electronic storage of data; data processing software; software for encryption; software for enabling secure financial transactions; software for processing and transferring electronic cash, digital currency, digital money, virtual money, virtual currency; computer application software for electronic storage of data; software for data protection, namely, encryption; downloadable databases in the field of assets transfer; data storage devices, namely, USB drives, external hard drives; devices for databases, namely, servers; data processing equipment, namely, electronic data processing apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research in the field of blockchain consensus; technical research in the field of computer hardware development; technical research in the field of cryptography; technical research in the field of data transmission and data protection; development of computers, namely, computer hardware; computer software development; research and development of new products for others; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; rental of computer software; computer programming; computer system design; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for database management; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for data processing; software as a services (SaaS) services featuring software for executing smart contracts; cloud computing featuring software for use in the field of cryptography, namely, for use in encryption, decryption, and authentication; cloud computing featuring software for data transmission for use in the field of data protection; consulting services in the field of cloud computing; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; consulting in the field of information technology; consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; computer technology consultancy; business technology software consultation services; development of computer hardware for server hosting; consulting services in the field of computer hardware development; developing computer hardware in the field of data transmission and data protection; developing computer hardware in the field of cryptography; developing computer hardware for data conversion; developing computer hardware for software using blockchain technology; designing software; developing software; developing software for smart contracts; developing software using blockchain technology; software engineering; developing software for protecting data; consulting in the field of software development; software engineering for data processing programs; customer specific software development; development of data processing software programs; updating software databases; development of computer algorithms; developing software for databases; developing software for data processing; developing software for artificial intelligence; developing software for providing services via API; data conversion of electronic information; data encryption and decoding services; data migration services; creation, development and maintenance of software for conducting financial transactions; providing an on-line network environment featuring technology that enables users to share data in the field of financial transactions; providing data networks of blockchains, namely, providing infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services featuring software for authentication and management of electronic data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2018 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |