CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PREVENT TO PROTECT

USPTO serial 87884107

PREVENT TO PROTECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREVENT TO PROTECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence D Graham

LAWRENCE D GRAHAM LOWE GRAHAM JONES PLLC701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Ozone gas generators that kill microorganisms on food products; Ozone gas generator systems for use in ozone water applications; Ozone gas generators for use in atmospheric applications; Ozone generators and sanitizers for disinfecting food and food processing equipment, namely, devices that spray ozone-infused water onto food and food processing equipment, and spray bars for use with conveyor belts that spray ozone-infused water onto food and food processing equipmentACTIVE—
042Engineering consultation services in the field of site evaluation of food processing facilities; Consultation services in the field of planning and design of food processing facilitiesACTIVE—
045Food safety consultation; Regulatory compliance consultation in the field of food safetyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance