USPTO serial 87889104
THINK FUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZARICK, DIANA G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THINK FUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig N. Killen
CRAIG N KILLEN NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLPONE WELLS FARGO CENTER 301 SOUTH COLLEGE STREET23RD FLOORCHARLOTTE, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; Vitamins; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary supplement drink mixes; Nutritional supplement energy bars; Nutritional and dietary supplements formed and packaged as bars; Meal replacement beverages and bars adapted for medical use; Vitamin and Mineral Supplements; Brain health nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements in the nature of Nootropics; Nutritional supplements in powder and pill form to improve memory focus and concentration | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |