USPTO serial 87889312
QUICKBURGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUICKBURGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Rosenstein
ROBERT B. ROSENSTEIN ROSENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES28600 MERCEDES ST., STE 100TEMECULA, CA 92590UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Hats; Hats for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Shirts; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; T-shirts; Athletic shirts; Baseball caps and hats; Chef hats; Chef shirts; Collared shirts; Golf shirts; Graphic T-shirts; Hooded sweat shirts; Knit shirts; Outerwear, namely, shirts and t-shirts and hats; Paper hats for use as clothing items; Polo shirts; Tee shirts; Tee-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Fast-food restaurant services; Fast-food restaurants; Fast-food restaurants and snackbars; Restaurant; Restaurant and bar services, including restaurant carryout services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services featuring sandwiches; Restaurant services featuring hamburgers and other fast food sandwiches, side items and drinks; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Restaurants; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |