USPTO serial 87890179
PHYSIOMIMIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2020
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PHYSIOMIMIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cambridge, England, GB
Thame, Oxfordshire, GB
Thame, Oxfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Armstrong
Todd Armstrong CLARK+ELBING LLPOne Financial Center, Suite 2110BOSTON, MA 02111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microfluidic devices, namely, microfluidic bio-chips for research or scientific purposes; microfluidic devices, namely, chip card readers for reading microfluidic bio-chips; Organ-on-chip devices, namely, microfluidic bio-chips for research or scientific purposes which simulate the activity, mechanics, and physiological response of entire organs and organ systems; microfluidic devices, namely, chip card readers for reading microfluidic bio-chips which simulate the activity, mechanics and physiological response of entire organs and organ systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research services utilizing microfluidic and organ-on-chip devices; biological research services utilizing microfluidic and organ-on-chip devices; bio-engineering services, namely, engineering services in the field of microfluidic and organ-on-chip devices; biochemical engineering services in the field of microfluidic and organ-on-chip devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CN Bio Innovations Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CN Bio Innovations Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CN Bio Innovations Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PHYSIOMIMIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |