USPTO serial 87890698
WAR HOGG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINERO GUARDA, GERARDO INAKI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WAR HOGG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Mandel
Lawrence D. Mandel GERTNER MANDEL, LLCP.O. BOX 301LAKEWOOD, NJ 08701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LIFESAVING VEST FOR USE BY DOGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | CANINE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, LEASHES AND COLLARS MADE OF NYLON; CLOTHING FOR ANIMALS IN THE NATURE OF VESTS; LANYARDS IN THE NATURE OF DOG COLLARS; MUZZLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY, NAMELY, FIREARMS TRAINING AND CANINE TRAINING; PROVIDING EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF MILITARY TACTICS IN THE EMPLOYMENT OF FIREARMS; TRAINING IN MILITARY TACTICS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIREARMS INDUSTRY, NAMELY, FIREARMS EDUCATION CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF CANINE EQUIPMENT; PRODUCT FIELD TESTING FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE MILITARY; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIREARM INDUSTRY, NAMELY, FIREARMS PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |