USPTO serial 87892203
SEAN IN THE WILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEAN IN THE WILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle Mancino Marsh, Esq.
MICHELLE MANCINO MARSH ARENT FOX LLP1301 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASFLOOR 42NEW YORK, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing ongoing webisodes and displaying a series of non-downloadable films featuring news, information and commentary in the fields of sports, pop culture, current events, and social and political issues via a global computer network and a video-on-demand service; Entertainment services, namely, producing live events in the nature of panel discussions featuring panelists discussing news, information and commentary in the fields of sports, pop culture, current events, and social and political issues | ACTIVE | Apr 18, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |