Drawing for TOTAL-CAPTURE

USPTO serial 87896703

TOTAL-CAPTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTAL-CAPTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Bonini, Jr.

Frank J. Bonini, Jr. Bonini IP Law, LLC150 N. Radnor Chester Rd.Suite F200Radnor, PA 19087

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Remote electronic monitoring via operation and use of satellite equipment using computers and sensors for the analysis of data via visible and non-visible electromagnetic wavelengths, such that materially all of the available wavelengths and/or spectrum necessary to perform subsequent analytics tasks are obtained at once, and/or at a rate faster than the underlying activity rate of the industry, activity or process being observed; spectral analysis of data via visible and non-visible electromagnetic wavelengths and data analysis for commercial, agricultural, geologic, energy and industrial fields, and for monitoring and identifying and differentiating activity, objects and/or living beings, taking place on, above and/or below the earth's surface, especially where the quality of the analytics are sufficient to replace human decision makingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 10, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 10, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 8, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 8, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 8, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance