Drawing for PYTHONXOS

USPTO serial 87896781

PYTHONXOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PYTHONXOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS M WILLIAMS

THOMAS M WILLIAMS BARACK FERRAZZANO KIRSCHBAUM & NAGELBERG LLP200 WEST MADISON STREET, SUITE 3900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for controlling the operation of a robotic or automated welding or plasma cutting machine systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2022EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 13, 2021RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 23, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 26, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 26, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 26, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 26, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 26, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 20, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 20, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 12, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 9, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 6, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 1, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance