USPTO serial 87897483
NEW YORK WATERMAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEW YORK WATERMAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colin P. Abrahams
COLIN P ABRAHAMS LAW OFFICE OF COLIN P ABRAHAMS310 N WESTLAKE BLVD, SUITE 120WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Water treatment apparatus for creating water to replicate a selected water composition; water treatment apparatus for creating water to replicate a selected water composition utilizing chromatography, frequency resonators, filtering, ionizers, ozonators, resin tanks; water treatment apparatus for creating water to replicate a selected water composition, including water analysis, and addition or removal of components in water to create water having the selected composition | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment of water to replicate a specific water composition; treatment of water to replicate a selected water composition utilizing chromatography, frequency resonators, filtering, ionizers, ozonators, resin tanks; services in providing addition or removal of components in water to create water having the selected composition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |