CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HIGH FASHIONED FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN WITH TROUBLED SOLES

USPTO serial 87898311

HIGH FASHIONED FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN WITH TROUBLED SOLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGH FASHIONED FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN WITH TROUBLED SOLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan E. Hollander

Susan E. Hollander VENABLE LLP101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 3800SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shoes; footwear; footwear, namely, pumps; women's shoes; sandals; dress shoes; boots; athletic shoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 17, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2019PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 15, 2019TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 7, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 17, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 1, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance