USPTO serial 87899326
WATERMARK DESIGNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, LAURA KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATERMARK DESIGNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANICA L MATHES
DANICA L MATHES BELL NUNNALLY & MARTIN LLP2323 ROSS AVE STE 1900ATTN: DANICA MATHESDALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Plumbing fixtures, namely, kitchen faucets, lavatory faucets, shower fixtures, namely, shower heads, shower arms, water controls, steam shower controls, shower fixture systems consisting primarily of shower heads, shower arms, water controls, and steam shower controls; shower drains; tub sets, namely, spouts, water control handles, and hand held shower sprayer; and expressly excluding bathroom fixtures, namely, bases for shower enclosures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 2021 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2020 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |