Drawing for WATERMARK BKLYN NEW YORK 1976

USPTO serial 87899362

WATERMARK BKLYN NEW YORK 1976

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATERMARK BKLYN NEW YORK 1976?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Clarida

ROBERT W CLARIDA REITLER KAILAS & ROSENBLATT LLC885 3RD AVE20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011plumbing fixtures, namely, kitchen faucets, lavatory faucets, showers, shower systems, shower drains, tub sets; bath accessories, namely, towel bars, console legs, cabinet knobs, cabinet hardware, grab bars, shower door pullsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 19, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 30, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 28, 2020GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 28, 2020GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 25, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2018MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance