Drawing for DEVICELINK

USPTO serial 87900989

DEVICELINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEVICELINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyriacos Tsircou

KYRIACOS TSIRCOU TSIRCOU LAW, P.C.515 S. FLOWER STREET, 18TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical instruments, namely, monitors, transmitters and controllers for measuring, monitoring and controlling measurement and actuator devices; electrical instruments, namely, monitors, transmitters and controllers for pH/ORP sensors; electrical monitors, transmitters and controllers for fluid conductivity sensors; monitors, transmitters and controllers for temperature sensors; electrical monitors, transmitters and controllers for pressure sensors; monitors, transmitter, controllers and accumulators for liquid flow sensors; and electrical monitors, transmitters and controllers for liquid level sensors and Chlorine, Dissolved Oxygen, Turbidity; all of the foregoing for use only in connection with industrial applications and facilities; all goods for the monitoring of liquid flow, pH, pressure, and liquid level, controlling those levels, and transmitting alert signals regarding increase or loss of liquid flow, pH, pressure, and liquid levelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance