Drawing for IDENTITY

USPTO serial 87902793

IDENTITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOO, JEANE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDENTITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Pandiscio

MARK J PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO436 BOSTON POST ROADWESTON, MA 02493UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Shower and tub and shower hot and cold water mixing valves; diverter valves in the nature of water control valves for showers; shower heads; hand-held showers and tub spoutsACTIVEApr 30, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 12, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 9, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 6, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 9, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 18, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 18, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 18, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 18, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 17, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 18, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance