Drawing for TRULY MOBILE TRULY BROADBAND

USPTO serial 87906480

TRULY MOBILE TRULY BROADBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TRULY MOBILE TRULY BROADBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia A. Smith

CLAUDIA A. SMITH WHITE & CASE LLP1221 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASTRADEMARK DEPARTMENTNEW YORK, NY 10020

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Satellite receivers, satellite transmitters, and satellite transceiversACTIVEMay 31, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 24, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 12, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 18, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 23, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance