Drawing for P

USPTO serial 87908971

P

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RONCORONI, LAUREN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAYE G. HEYBL

JAYE G. HEYBL FERGUSON CASE ORR PATERSON LLP1050 KIMBALL ROADVENTURA, CA 93004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Adjustable beds; Mattress cushions; Mattress toppers; Mattresses and pillows; Pillows; Bed pillows; Latex mattresses; Latex pillows; Sleep products, namely, mattresses, spring mattresses, box springs and mattress foundationsACTIVEJun 1, 2017
024Bed sheets; Mattress covers; Mattress pads; Baby bedding, namely, bundle bags, swaddling blankets, crib bumpers, fitted crib sheets, crib skirts, crib blankets, and diaper changing pad covers not of paper; Covers for mattressesACTIVEJun 1, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 6, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 6, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 22, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 8, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 18, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 18, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 21, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 18, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 11, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2018MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance