Drawing for DICED

USPTO serial 87911959

DICED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DICED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel Jurist

RACHEL JURIST MEISTER SEELIG & FEIN LLP125 PARK AVENUE, 7TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Online journals, namely, blogs featuring content in the fields of cooking, baking, recipes, wine, mixology and culinary arts, pastry and baking arts, culinary and restaurant management, and hospitality management; providing online magazines in the fields of cooking, baking, recipes, wine, mixology and culinary arts, pastry and baking arts, culinary and restaurant management, and hospitality management; providing online non-downloadable articles in the fields of cooking, baking, recipes, wine, mixology and culinary arts, pastry and baking arts, culinary and restaurant management, and hospitality management; providing online interviews with chefs in the fields of cooking, baking, wine, mixology and culinary arts, pastry and baking arts, culinary and restaurant management, and hospitality management for entertainment purposesACTIVEMay 2, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance