USPTO serial 87920777
GRID-X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RISO, MARK E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRID-X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie A. Katz
JULIE A. KATZ VIRTUAL GENERAL COUNSEL1711 N. HERMITAGE AVE.CHICAGO, IL 60622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Strategic and business consulting services for critical infrastructure transformation in the energy sector; visionary planning to define infrastructure requirements to meet present and future needs; collaboration and facilitation across domains and jurisdictions; operational risk assessment; infrastructure review and road mapping; critical infrastructure convergence and enablement; operational benchmarking; creation of asset management programs, reliability-centered maintenance programs, organizational change management; project management in the energy sector; program management in the energy sector; workforce strategy, connected community development, and stakeholder engagement in the energy sector | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training, leadership development and skills assessment as it applies to energy sector infrastructure, namely competency skills assessment, gap analysis, hiring and training and development plans to create the workforce for the future, career coaching, and critical infrastructure training and leadership development | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consulting services and studies in the energy sector, namely in the field of infrastructure and organizational transformation, to design, construct, operate, and maintain energy infrastructure and respond to emergencies, namely reliability, safety, customer centricity, optimization, emergency response, growth, cost effectiveness | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Regulatory and government strategy consulting services for energy sector critical infrastructure as it relates to jurisdiction, standards, investment, maintenance, and operations; providing regulatory, government and policy strategy and advice to executives and their stakeholders to evolve infrastructure to better meet the interests of society-at-large; technical and strategic consulting support for regulatory and policy development as it relates to critical infrastructure for the energy sector | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Grid-X Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named GRID-X
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |