USPTO serial 87921432
TIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS-RIGGS, LESLIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Linköping, SE
Linköping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
MILENA S. MISHEV KAPLAN BREYER SCHWARZ, LLP90 MATAWAN ROADSUITE 201MATAWAN, NJ 07747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Rotary-wing and fixed-wing aircraft defense system comprised of missile warning sensors, radars, controllers, interceptor missiles, sequencers, dispensers, with capability to defeat Rocket Propelled Grenade (RPG), Air-to-Air Missile (AAM), Beam Rider (BR), Aerial Improvised Explosive Device (AIED), Man Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) type of threats | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | (Based on Intent to Use) Rotary-wing and fixed-wing aircraft defense system comprised of interceptor missiles, missile warning sensors, radars, controllers, sequencers, dispensers, with capability to defeat Rocket Propelled Grenade (RPG), Air-to-Air Missile (AAM), Beam Rider (BR), Aerial Improvised Explosive Device (AIED), Man Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) type of threats | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Research, design and new product development of rotary-wing and fixed-wing Aircraft defense system with capability to defeat Rocket Propelled Grenade (RPG), Air-to-Air Missile (AAM), Beam Rider (BR), Aerial Improvised Explosive Device (AIED), Man Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) type of threats | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |