USPTO serial 87921868
CLEAR BLUE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEAR BLUE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori S. Kozak
LORI S. KOZAK FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVE, BUILDING 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for monitoring and managing remote street light and electricity generation installations; street light controllers; security camera controllers; electronic controllers for remote weather stations for controlling the collection and transmission of weather station data to remote facilities; cellular and WiFi communication transmitter controllers for controlling the transmission of radio, cellular and WiFi signals; solar powered outdoor lights, namely, street lights, building lights, accent lights, beacon lights; wind turbine powered outdoor lights, namely, street lights building lights, accent lights; solar powered security camera; wind turbine powered security cameras and parts therefor; sale of solar powered light, security and telecommunication installations; installation of solar powered light, security and telecommunication installations; monitoring of solar powered light, security and telecommunication installations; management and operation of solar powered light, security and telecommunication installations; sale of wind turbine electric powered light, security and telecommunication installations; installation of wind turbine electric powered light, security and telecommunication installations; monitoring of wind turbine electric powered light, security and telecommunication installations; management and operation of wind turbine electric powered light, security and telecommunication installations; remote monitoring of electric generation, storage and load management of solar and wind electricity generation installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |