USPTO serial 87922747
BEETOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEETOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Parjus
MARIA B PARJUS PARJUS LAW1535 N PARK DR STE 104WESTON, FL 33326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Providing medical aesthetic procedures, namely, treating the skin with dermal fillers and botulinum toxin; Skin treatment, namely, the injection of dermal fillers to reduce the appearance of facial fine lines; Skin treatments, namely, the injection of dermal filling agents and neuromuscular blocking agents to reduce the appearance of facial lines and wrinkles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2019 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |