Drawing for NEIGHBORS BY RING

USPTO serial 87924989

NEIGHBORS BY RING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEIGHBORS BY RING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Purvi Patel Albers

Purvi Patel Albers Haynes and Boone LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing online, non-downloadable software, namely, communications software for electronically posting and exchanging data, audio, video images and graphics via computer, mobile, wireless, telecommunications networks; providing online, non-downloadable software for processing images, graphics, audio and video data, and text; providing online, non-downloadable software that allows users to post and share videos; providing online, non-downloadable software that allows users to remotely monitor security alarm systems, automated environmental systems, networked kitchen appliances, and cameras in homes, office, and other facilities; providing an online network environment that features technology that enables users to share and post data in the field of security for homes offices, and other facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 11, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 15, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 3, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 10, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 17, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 14, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 20, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2018GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2018GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2018EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Sep 13, 2018CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance