USPTO serial 87925300
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY HORWITZ
BARRY HORWITZ GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP77 W WACKER DR STE 3100CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath soaps; Bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes; Beauty creams; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty serums; Body creams; Body lotion; Body sprays; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Bubble bath; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic hand creams; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetics; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics in general, including perfumes; Essential oils; Eye cream; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Make-up; Perfume; Cosmetic bath salts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |