USPTO serial 87926100
VERITAS | FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERITAS | FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KOURTNEY A MULCAHY
KOURTNEY A MULCAHY AKERMAN LLP777 SOUTH FLAGLER DRSUITE 1100 WEST TOWERWEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Raw unprocessed hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing services for others in the field of processing hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 271 Lake Davis Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks owned by 271 Lake Davis Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named VERITAS | FARMS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2022 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |