USPTO serial 87926141
BLUEBIRD BOTANICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUEBIRD BOTANICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH K SQUIERS
DEBORAH K SQUIERS COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC114 WEST 47TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS FOR CATS AND DOGS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS FOR CATS AND DOGS CONTAINING HEMP; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE FORM OF CAPSULES, EXTRACTS, AND OILS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE FORM OF CAPSULES, EXTRACTS, AND OILS; ALL OF THE FOREGOING CONTAINING HEMP WITH A DELTA-9 TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL CONCENTRATION OF NOT MORE THAN 0.3 PERCENT ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| May 6, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |