Drawing for WORKFUSION AUTOMATION CLOUD

USPTO serial 87926604

WORKFUSION AUTOMATION CLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKFUSION AUTOMATION CLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr.

CHRISTOPHER D. OLSZYK, JR. FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVE, BLDG. 3LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software for use in manual process automation, robotic automation, smart process automation, and cognitive-based automation, of corporate digital operationsACTIVE
042Consulting services in the field of office and workplace automation; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software tools for use in manual process automation, robotic automation, smart process automation, and cognitive-based automation of corporate digital operations; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software tools for use in manual process automation, robotic automation, smart process automation, and cognitive-based automation, of corporate digital operations; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in manual process automation, robotic automation, smart process automation, and cognitive-based automation, of corporate digital operations; Providing a web hosting platform for providing software tools for use in manual process automation, robotic automation, smart process automation, and cognitive-based automation, of corporate digital operations; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for use in manual process automation, robotic automation, smart process automation, and cognitive-based automation, of corporate digital operationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 25, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 30, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 22, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 1, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 28, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 21, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance