Drawing for UNA PHYTOLOGY RANGE

USPTO serial 87926954

UNA PHYTOLOGY RANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, CLINTON J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNA PHYTOLOGY RANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DENNIS H CAVANAUGH

DENNIS H CAVANAUGH D H CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES555 FIFTH AVENUE FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Preparations for grooming and cleaning the hair, in particular shampoos, hair conditioners, hair creams, hair masks, non-medicated hair serums, Hair gel and hair mousse, conditioning preparations in the nature of hair conditioners, rinses and oils for hair conditioning, namely, hair rinses and hair oils, hair gels, phials in the nature of aromatic essential oils and hair oils, pomades for setting the hair, preparations and products for dyeing in the nature of hair coloring preparations and hair dyes and hair rinses, Hair coloring preparations for coloring and bleaching the hair, hydrogen peroxide-based cosmetics, hair styling spray; cosmeticsACTIVEMar 24, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 30, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2020PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Apr 30, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 10, 2020PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 6, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 4, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2020PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Feb 26, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 18, 2020PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 9, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 9, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 22, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance