USPTO serial 87926954
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cadriano di Granarolo, IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENNIS H CAVANAUGH
DENNIS H CAVANAUGH D H CAVANAUGH ASSOCIATES555 FIFTH AVENUE FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Preparations for grooming and cleaning the hair, in particular shampoos, hair conditioners, hair creams, hair masks, non-medicated hair serums, Hair gel and hair mousse, conditioning preparations in the nature of hair conditioners, rinses and oils for hair conditioning, namely, hair rinses and hair oils, hair gels, phials in the nature of aromatic essential oils and hair oils, pomades for setting the hair, preparations and products for dyeing in the nature of hair coloring preparations and hair dyes and hair rinses, Hair coloring preparations for coloring and bleaching the hair, hydrogen peroxide-based cosmetics, hair styling spray; cosmetics | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |