Drawing for SUSTAINABLE LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEMS

USPTO serial 87927594

SUSTAINABLE LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SUSTAINABLE LOCAL FOOD ECOSYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis Wadsworth

CURTIS WADSWORTH THREE10 CONSULTING1532 GARFIELD AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technological planning and consulting services in the field of agriculture; Technology consultation and research in the field of agriculture; Technology consultation in the field of agriculture; Technology research in the field of agriculture; Computer technology consultancy in the field of agriculture; Development of new technology for others in the field of agriculture; Integrated scientific research on vermin for greenhouses and harvest crops; Providing an on-line network environment featuring technology that enables users to share data in the field of agriculture; Research and development of technology in the field of agriculture; Scientific and technological services, namely, crop growth in the field of agricultureACTIVEDec 1, 2017
044Greenhouse servicesACTIVEDec 1, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 25, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 25, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 22, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance