USPTO serial 87928478
Serial No. 87928478
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODWIN, KATRINA JOYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 87928478?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chinhwei Chen
CHINHWEI CHEN JIANQ CHYUN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE7F. -1, NO. 100, ROOSEVELT RD. SEC. 2TAIPEI, 10084TAIWANGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cleaning robots for home use or professional use; Robotic vacuum cleaners; Industrial robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Robots for supporting communications at remote locations in the nature of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Robots for supporting conversations in the nature of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Robots for supporting sightseeing in the nature of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Humanoid robots configured to output voice; Humanoid robots with camera functions; Robots for providing knowledge to students in the nature of teaching robots; Robots for speaking with human in the nature of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Robots for taking care of guests in the nature of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; Telecommunication machines and apparatus, namely, computers; Electronic machines, apparatus and structural parts therefor, namely, computers; Computer operating programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Transforming robotic toys; Electronic toys, namely, electronic action toys, electronic learning toys; Robotic toys for entertainment in the nature of toy robots; Dolls; Amusement machines and apparatus for use in amusement parks, namely, coin-operated amusement machines, amusement game machines, and amusement park rides; Game machines and apparatus in the nature of video game machines for use with televisions, electronic gaming machines that accept a wager, machines for playing games of chance; Parts and attachments of game machines and apparatus, namely, parts and attachments of video game machines for use with televisions, electronic gaming machines that accept a wager, machines for playing games of chance; Game machines and apparatus containing an image display device in the nature of stand-alone video output game machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |