USPTO serial 87930500
LUCID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DICKSON, RACHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUCID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thor A. Hoyte
THOR A. HOYTE CELADON LAW & BUSINESS GROUP6305 HAWKS PRAIRIE RD NEOLYMPIA, WA 98516UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management consulting and advisory services in the areas of corporate growth strategy, innovation and growth processes, organizational transformation, and talent management and development strategies; Management of customer appreciation programs of others; Retail apparel stores; Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; Retail store services featuring convenience store items and gasoline; Branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for businesses and/or individuals; Business management advice; Business management analysis; Business management and advice; Business management and consultation; Business management and enterprise organization consultancy; Business management consultancy services; Business management consultancy, also via the Internet; Business management consultation; Business management consulting; Business management for a trade company and for a service company; Business management for shops; Business management planning; Business management supervision; Business knowledge management services; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, production, personnel and retail sale matters; Business organization and management consultancy including personnel management; Business project management services; Commercial management; Consulting services in the fields of business management, human resources, and business organizational design; Corporate event management services; Customer relationship management; Human resources management; Online retail convenience store services featuring in-store order pickup; Online retail department store services featuring in-store order pickup; Personnel management consultation; Personnel management consulting; Sales management services; Supply chain management services; Trade show management services | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2015 |
| 042 | Planning and design of retail premises | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |