USPTO serial 87937582
IKIGAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YI, CRYSTAL HAEIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IKIGAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Maria del Aguila, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina Ruiz
CHRISTINA RUIZ CHRISTINAPASEO SANTA MARIA DEL AGUILA 69SANTA MARIA DEL AGUILA, 04710SPAINGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Fruit salads and vegetable salads; Fruit and vegetable salads; Pre-cut vegetable salad; Vegetable salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) (Based on Intent to Use) Seeds for horticultural purposes; Seeds for planting; Seeds for sowing; Agricultural seeds; Crop seeds; Fresh tomatoes; Fresh cherry tomatoes; Fresh grape cherry tomatoes; Raw tomatoes; Unprocessed tomatoes; Vegetable seeds for planting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |