USPTO serial 87941312
FUMAKILLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUMAKILLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
George W. Lewis WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLP8500 LEESBURG PIKE SUITE 7500TYSONS, VA 22182UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Diffusers for insect repellants and insecticides in the nature of electrical devices to be plugged into wall outlets having a heating element and which dispenses insect repellent and insecticides; Electric apparatus for destroying mosquitoes in the nature of outdoor automated mist system for pest control in the nature of destroying mosquitoes comprised of lights, exhaust system, aeroponic misting chamber and automated control system; Electric apparatus for evaporating the insecticides for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2024 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |