Drawing for TOY UPGRADE

USPTO serial 87941929

TOY UPGRADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOY UPGRADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle Gross TMCP-ASU

111 E. TAYLOR ST., MAIL CODE 9520LISA FOUNDATION PATENT LAW CLINICPHOENIX, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software platforms, downloadable, for providing audio and visual educational content for downloadable mobile applications; Downloadable educational course materials in the field of foreign language, STEM, and early childhood education; Downloadable mobile applications for early childhood and foreign language education; Downloadable mobile applications for providing educational services in the fields of early childhood education, foreign language education, and STEM education; Downloadable mobile applications for multi-subject educational services sold as a unit with a positionable figure; Downloadable mobile applications for providing multi-subject educational services through a user created real world interactive environment with the use of two and three dimensional positionable figures; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for providing educational services through a user created real world interactive environment with the use of two and three dimensional positionable figuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 25, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance