Drawing for HELICOPTERS ARE PEOPLE TOO!

USPTO serial 87942754

HELICOPTERS ARE PEOPLE TOO!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NASSERGHODSI, SAHAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELICOPTERS ARE PEOPLE TOO!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Burns

MARK J. BURNS HAUGEN LAW FIRM PLLP121 SOUTH EIGHTH STREETSUITE 1130MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Fluid pumping systems for use in aircraft engine oil and hydraulic fluid filling operations, namely, pneumatic and electric pumps and associated replacement valves, fittings, tubing, and tubing nozzles therefore to be used in connection with the pneumatic pumps and electric pumps to control the flow of the aircraft engine oil and hydraulic fluidACTIVE—
008Fluid pumping systems for use in aircraft engine oil and hydraulic fluid filling operations, namely, hand-operated pumps and associated replacement valves, fittings, tubing, and tubing nozzles therefore to be used in connection with the hand-operated pumps to control the flow of the aircraft engine oil and hydraulic fluidACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 27, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 27, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 27, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 2, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance