Drawing for GOLF RIVAL

USPTO serial 87945595

GOLF RIVAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOPKINS II, DEAN ANDREW
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GOLF RIVAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linan Yao

LINAN YAO YC LAW GROUP, PC2880 ZANKER ROAD, #203SAN JOSE, CA 95134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable ringtones, pre-recorded music, and graphics presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Production of video and computer game software; Providing on-line computer games; Providing a computer game for use network-wide by network usersACTIVEMar 27, 2018
042Computer programming of computer games; Computer programming of video games; Computer programming services for games; Design and development of computer game software and virtual reality software; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in competitions, track performance of computer gamesACTIVEApr 17, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 23, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 23, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 27, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance