USPTO serial 87951287
FOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard F Mandelbaum
HOWARD F MANDELBAUM MANDELBAUM SILFIN ECONOMOU LLP222 BLOOMINGDALE ROADSUITE 120WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for database management; computer software for use in decision support systems; computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; computer software for use in enterprise reporting and analysis systems and for building applications for the management and tracking of data for enterprise reporting systems; computer database programs for use in connection with decision support, analysis, and reporting programs; computer software development tools for use in developing decision support, analysis, and reporting systems and applications; computer software, namely, client/server reporting, analysis and decision support tools; computerized database, reporting, and analysis software for use on corporate intranet web sites; enterprise server software for use in web based data publishing, reporting, and analysis solutions; computer software for accessing databases by means of global computer networks to generate reports; software development tools for making reporting and analysis available through global computer network worldwide websites and for extending the functionality of enterprise reporting and analysis systems on to global computer networks; computer software for accessing and updating databases through global computer networks; computer software for collection, analysis, distribution and reporting of data within an enterprise and over intranets, extranets and global computer networks, for database updating and management, and decision support, and for business intelligence; computer software for database analytics, graphics, and mapping; computer software for the construction of dashboards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |